tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post6456946863623189311..comments2024-03-28T11:07:52.205-07:00Comments on Irons in the Fire: You might remember Howard Good, who thought outing gun owners-Firehandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04562365951182027709noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-12685390862163284012013-02-04T12:28:46.663-08:002013-02-04T12:28:46.663-08:00Much like the politician in Washington(or Oregon?)...Much like the politician in Washington(or Oregon?) screaming about being threatened, but refusing to release the 'threats'. And it turned out the police looked at the couple of e-mails in question and said- in very proper manner- "Please don't trouble us with this crap, this isn't a threat."Firehandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04562365951182027709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-86254034826086506212013-02-04T12:14:18.350-08:002013-02-04T12:14:18.350-08:00Professor Good is now the target of multiple death...<i>Professor Good is now the target of multiple death threats. Your posting a photo of his HOUSE is now linked to this crime and you are now a suspect.</i><br /><br />Does anonymous really think that posting a photo of a dude's house makes you a "suspect" in an alleged* death threat?<br /><br />There's a reason police don't throw the term "suspect" around lightly (or, hell, even "person of interest") - and "posting a photo of his house" wouldn't rise to the occasion, not with half the gun-related internet in a tizzy about him.<br /><br />(* I don't doubt that some moron or multiple morons did send him something that either was or was easily construed as one - but it's still alleged until someone else verifies.)<br /><br />Sigivaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16152366541957466049noreply@blogger.com