Monday, April 04, 2011

Among the reasons I think A: the UN can collectively

kiss my ass and B: why we should throw that organization out of this country is this:
Self-defence is a widely recognized, yet legally proscribed, exception to the universal duty to respect the right to life of others. Self-defence is a basis for exemption from criminal responsibility that can be raised by any State agent or non-State actor. Self-defence is sometimes designated as a “right.” There is inadequate legal support for such an interpretation. Self-defence is more properly characterized as a means of protecting the right to life and, as such, a basis for avoiding responsibility for violating the rights of another.
That is how the bastards see the concept of self-defense: it only exists to them as a way for you to escape punishment for 'violating the rights' of someone who attacks you, or your family or home.

It also, as the article shows, is part of their basis for why all the commoners should be disarmed(for our own good, of course).

If G. Washington did come back for a while, I tend to think he'd burn the UN building down before worrying about excitement over the royal wedding across the Atlantic.


Titan Mk6B said...

Those silly people.

Let me see if I have this correct. Self defense is the exemption from punishment for violating their civil rights when they are violating your civil rights.

Actually kind of what I would expect from someone who does not live under a constitution such as ours that recognizes our basic rights. To me self defense kind of falls under the right to life.

Firehand said...

It's not only that they don't live, never lived under our Constitution: they don't want us to be able to anymore.

Which is one reason they really don't like us peasants being armed; it makes their wanting to control us that much harder.