Obviously, I can’t prove that West Point was deliberately trying to make Pete look bad, or that ProPublica would have moved forward with their "bombshell" story had Pete not proved them wrong before publishing. I can only assure you that LOTS of bureaucrats currently employed by the US Military do NOT want to work for Pete Hegseth. And it seems equally clear that ProPublica isn't all that interested in writing stories about bureaucrats who actively and repeatedly misinform them. And that's a pity.
Connected, thanks to the commies and general leftist idiots here,
Could campus protests against Israel turn violent?
Well, duh. So many of our institutions of 'higher education' have coddled and encouraged these Jew-haters to the point they're pretty sure they'll have at least some protection, so yes, they almost certainly will.
2 comments:
I can only assure you that LOTS of bureaucrats currently employed by the US Military do NOT want to work for Pete Hegseth.
Well, in about a month, he's going to be the head of their chain of command, so, good luck with this.
If you strike at a king, you must kill him. If this is what qualifies as "strategy" at West Point, then the whole place needs an enema.
So, how does the Army refer to parents of adopted children, since neither of them 'birthed' the child? Is it too late to put spikes on the clue bat?
Post a Comment