Incidents like this should concern every American gun owner. A man was arrested in his own country for a lawful photo taken in ours. That level of state control did not appear in the UK overnight. It arrived step by step, regulation by regulation, each justified as “reasonable.”
If we are not vigilant in the United States, in the courts, in Congress, and at the state level, the same slow creep can happen here. What happened in the UK is not an anomaly. It is the predictable end state of a culture and legal system that treats civilian gun ownership as a privilege to be curtailed instead of a right to be protected.
I'd go further: it's not just the right to arms, it's the very right to self-defense. Their 'elites' don't like it, don't approve of it, and have created the situation in which it's not legal. At all. Not just discouraged, but "Yes, he had a knife/club and threatened you and your whoever, but you used more aggression than the Crown Prosecutor thinks was right, so you're off to prison."
And you can't speak what you think, because the cops have become the assholes they are who care more about going through social media looking for something offensive, somehow, to somebody, than they care for finding stolen cars and catching burglars.*
Freedoms interconnect. And their and our 'elites' hate them.
*"Oi, mate, it so much safer than doing what's supposed to be our actual job!"
*"Oi, mate, it so much safer than doing what's supposed to be our actual job!"
7 comments:
I miss Maggie Thatcher.
Those who support ever-more-restrictive gun control keep asking for evidence of the "slippery-slope."
Well, here it is.
Part of our objection is that he was engaged in an activity that is legal here (where he was at the time of the activity). There are things you can be imprisoned for in the United States, even if what you did was legal in the country you conducted the activity in. So, one of the bigger questions is, does your country of citizenship have the right to prosecute you for activity conducted legally in a foreign land?
Consider the welfare check as 'legal' (but not lawful) means to violate the 4th Amendment.
Wouldn't it be a bummer to live in a dry county and visit a restaurant in another county and someone take your picture drinking a beer, go home, get arrested..
Makes as much sense to me.
YaKnow, people who go to Las Vegas and go to a cat house, pay for sex, get home and get arrested for it?
People otta follow those judges around. Surely they do something illegal
I have as clients multiple locations in the UK and have a few years ago of the evil muzzy conquest of that Kingdom told them all every single one "I will take on your cases but I will not land to the UK for any reason as I believe my political postings here in USA on multiple social and business platforms will result in my arrest right at landing airport". I have a great many times posted VERY clearly that UK good men and women need to look on and treat their bobbies and judges and courts as enemies and that armed violent insurrection against them all is their one and only recourse to win back their freedom. This story of a UK man arrested for the crime of just holding a gun here to USA is a perfect example of the tyranny of the UK today. UK no longer has "Subjects" rather they are chattel and slaves to the crown.
I have said it before but I will say it again: There is a reason we left England.
Despite all the balloon juice put out (mostly by politicians) about the "special relationship" between the US and England, we left them - and had to shoot our way out. It far past time for most Americans to remember that.
English values ARE NOT American values. England is, and has been a police state for a very long time. The government of England, voted for by the citizens of England consider this an appropriate use of their time and money.
Post a Comment