are sweet.
And so is this:
ORDERED, that the Defendants take such action as is necessary to permit Tab
Bonidy to use the public parking lot adjacent to the Avon Post Office Building with a firearm
authorized by his Concealed Carry Permit secured in his car in a reasonably prescribed
manner, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, that the other claims of unconstitutionality of 39 C.F.R. §
232.1(l) made by Plaintiffs are denied.
Ref Chicago and the Rahm Whine, borrowing from Taranto and Insty,
The Trib adds: “While gun owners may have questions about how soon
they’ll be able to carry guns in public, other state residents may also
have questions about where they can expect to find people armed with
deadly weapons.”
That’s an easy one to answer: You can expect to find people armed
with deadly weapons in just about any dodgy Chicago neighborhood. . . .
Wait, how could Chicago have all those shootings when it’s illegal to
carry a gun? Don’t street criminals have any respect for the law? Oh
wait, of course they don’t–which is why Chicago already had “virtually
unregulated weapons.” The new law will allow honest citizens, those who
do comply with regulations, to defend themselves.
1 comment:
other state residents may also have questions about where they can expect to find people armed with deadly weapons
People need to point out, every time this stupid crap comes up, that somehow that isn't a problem in Vermont, where essentially anyone not a Felon can carry at will.
Or, well, a problem in any of the states where concealed carry is legal.
Post a Comment