Thursday, July 11, 2013

A: The tears of gun bigot control freaks

are sweet.

And so is this:
ORDERED, that the Defendants take such action as is necessary to permit Tab Bonidy to use the public parking lot adjacent to the Avon Post Office Building with a firearm authorized by his Concealed Carry Permit secured in his car in a reasonably prescribed manner, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that the other claims of unconstitutionality of 39 C.F.R. § 232.1(l) made by Plaintiffs are denied.


Ref Chicago and the Rahm Whine, borrowing from Taranto and Insty,
The Trib adds: “While gun owners may have questions about how soon they’ll be able to carry guns in public, other state residents may also have questions about where they can expect to find people armed with deadly weapons.”

That’s an easy one to answer: You can expect to find people armed with deadly weapons in just about any dodgy Chicago neighborhood. . . .

Wait, how could Chicago have all those shootings when it’s illegal to carry a gun? Don’t street criminals have any respect for the law? Oh wait, of course they don’t–which is why Chicago already had “virtually unregulated weapons.” The new law will allow honest citizens, those who do comply with regulations, to defend themselves.

1 comment:

  1. other state residents may also have questions about where they can expect to find people armed with deadly weapons

    People need to point out, every time this stupid crap comes up, that somehow that isn't a problem in Vermont, where essentially anyone not a Felon can carry at will.

    Or, well, a problem in any of the states where concealed carry is legal.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.