Thursday, November 28, 2019

If you're looking for some reading entertainment,

and you haven't seen the site before, I highly recommend this guy.  Has a whole string of "Things I won't work with"* posts full of chemistry knowledge such as
No, that’s a perfectly accurate statement of their research program: this new paper’s introduction includes the phrase “In our continuing efforts to introduce as many nitro groups associated with a tetrazole ring as possible. . .” and to most organic chemists that’s roughly equivalent to saying something like “In our continuing efforts to spray as much graffiti on the snouts of salt-water crocodiles as possible. . .” Because if that were your research program, you’d seek out the most humungous reptiles available and position yourself at the best angle to give them a cloud of Krylon straight up the ol’ nostrils, right? Same difference.
I think you'll enjoy it.


*link on his sidebar

3 comments:

  1. I used to read his blog for TIWWW and the homeopathy ridicule. I know just enough chemistry to start shrieking, "He did WHAT with fluorine and oxygen?!"

    https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2010/02/23/things_i_wont_work_with_dioxygen_difluoride

    "A. G. Streng, folks, absolutely takes the corrosive exploding cake, and I have to tip my asbestos-lined titanium hat to him."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Much like you: I know just a little bit, but it's enough sometimes to wonder "Why the HELL did they do that?"

    And that one you named is one of my favorites

    ReplyDelete
  3. Toastrider8:02 PM

    He has an excellent 'history of chemistry' book as well, but his 'things I won't work with' series really does make me giggle. Even if you have only a basic grasp of chemistry, you can rapidly figure out why his commentary involves 'Haha, no way do I want to get near this.'

    "Not that it’s what you’d call a perfect compound in that regard – despite a lot of effort, it’s still not quite ready to be hauled around in trucks. There’s a recent report of a method to make a more stable form of it, by mixing it with TNT. Yes, this is an example of something that becomes less explosive as a one-to-one cocrystal with TNT. Although, as the authors point out, if you heat those crystals up the two components separate out, and you’re left with crystals of pure CL-20 soaking in liquid TNT, a situation that will heighten your awareness of the fleeting nature of life." --from his entry on CL-20, aka Hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane.

    ReplyDelete