tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post7851042556744865869..comments2024-03-28T06:02:08.977-07:00Comments on Irons in the Fire: How screwed is the situation in Colorado?Firehandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04562365951182027709noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-37446090028219311502013-07-04T06:11:42.448-07:002013-07-04T06:11:42.448-07:00Hickenlooper. Hm. Kind of sounds like a character ...Hickenlooper. Hm. Kind of sounds like a character from Keith Laumer's 'Retief' stories.Marjanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-50636848861799013722013-07-03T13:54:55.925-07:002013-07-03T13:54:55.925-07:00It may be; but if the sheriff's don't know...It may be; but if the sheriff's don't know if it is or not, I'd hate to trust to it.Firehandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04562365951182027709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-71974215434854284342013-07-03T10:35:08.814-07:002013-07-03T10:35:08.814-07:00Is "transfer" defined in the law?
I'...Is "transfer" defined in the law?<br /><br />I'm pretty sure the Feds, for instance, don't consider "returning stolen property" to even be a transfer, rather than simply returning the property to its <i>existing rightful owner</i>...<br /><br />(In other words, it's only a transfer if it's changing owners; the theft didn't change ownership, just possession, so returning it to its actual owner is not itself a "transfer" back to the owner.<br /><br />At least that's my understanding of the Federal system around when it's a "transfer" in this context.<br /><br />If the Colorado law didn't specifically define "transfer" - or sue an existing definition - in such a way as to specifically include theft as a "transfer", this might be a non-issue.)Sigivaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16152366541957466049noreply@blogger.com