tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post6667372471066565923..comments2024-03-28T00:27:14.676-07:00Comments on Irons in the Fire: Why a 'journalist' won't cover ClimaquiddickFirehandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04562365951182027709noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-36171822739274138732009-11-28T09:41:35.601-08:002009-11-28T09:41:35.601-08:00Oh, I like that quoteOh, I like that quoteFirehandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04562365951182027709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-75564862632828139162009-11-27T14:12:32.753-08:002009-11-27T14:12:32.753-08:00With some luck we are seeing a scientific paradigm...With some luck we are seeing a scientific paradigm change.<br /><br />I can't remember who wrote:<br /><br />"Scientific theories should be enjoyed as summer flings, not married as life partners"<br /><br />Your journalist's refusal to "Feed the conspiracy theorists" suggests that he thinks of anthropogenic warming, in terms more like a cherished religious dogma, than a scientific theory (or teenage snogging partner), that is to be dumped as soon as something better comes allong.<br /><br />I can't find it now to credit it, but I saw one comment:<br /><br />"So AGW was Mann made"Keithnoreply@blogger.com