tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post6338534807175687951..comments2024-03-28T00:27:14.676-07:00Comments on Irons in the Fire: Not only do they not approve of violence to protect against common criminals,Firehandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04562365951182027709noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-77841463317055355552012-05-15T19:10:21.047-07:002012-05-15T19:10:21.047-07:00I'm going to have to dig out my copy of Luther...I'm going to have to dig out my copy of Luther v Borden to see what Justice Taney had to say about this (yes, the Dred Scott Taney. IIRC in Luther v Borden he said that the constitution did not authorize the taking up of arms against a state that had 5-1 mis-apportioned representation in the state house, that refused to change said re-apportionment and which refused to eliminate the onerous property requirement for voting and establish universal white male sufferage as was common in every other state in the Union).Windy Wilsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01951254236693386401noreply@blogger.com