tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post5069173205198784697..comments2024-03-28T09:06:56.994-07:00Comments on Irons in the Fire: This brings SWAT bullshit to a whole new levelFirehandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04562365951182027709noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-75990336102709276422014-06-28T20:06:47.088-07:002014-06-28T20:06:47.088-07:00Great. Let 'em have that argument. It turns ou...Great. Let 'em have that argument. It turns out that employees of "private corporations" so not enjoy the qualified immunity that is extended to government functionaries. You just raided the wrong house or flashbanged a baby in his crib? Sue the bastards into the ground.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-2913857794875450602014-06-27T19:17:45.410-07:002014-06-27T19:17:45.410-07:00My Administrative law professor said that criminal...My Administrative law professor said that criminal courts could be given over to the police under the principles of administrative law since the police were an administrative unit already.<br />That is way different from a charity running police operations. <br />As a 501(c)(3), where is their authority to make arrests, serve warrants and otherwise conduct police operations? Would a 501(c)(3) named a "Military Action Council" fly as a private army or would it be called out as the mercenaries they are just as the Law Enforcement Council is a gang?Windy Wilsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01951254236693386401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-67646766095514993382014-06-27T16:37:57.067-07:002014-06-27T16:37:57.067-07:00Hmm, if they are indeed 'immune' to open r...Hmm, if they are indeed 'immune' to open records requests, would they not be open to civil and criminal suits and arrest for violations of law? Perhaps they might want to rethink this whole thing and instead operate under strict rules, regulations and policies.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com