tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post238194663404739775..comments2024-03-28T11:07:52.205-07:00Comments on Irons in the Fire: Yeah, why WOULD JP Morgan want to hire someoneFirehandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04562365951182027709noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-67573167019767022502012-10-13T16:41:14.786-07:002012-10-13T16:41:14.786-07:00Commenter: So the Govt rounding up citizens based ...Commenter: So the Govt rounding up citizens based on Religion or Ethnic ID would not warrant armed resistance if courts bless as constitutional.<br /><br />CSGV: Correct<br /><br />"Would the Jews have been justified in using force to resist 'relocation to the east' by the Germans in WW2?"<br /><br />"Would the Japanese Americans have been justified in using force to resist relocation to internment camps by the US Government in WW2?"<br /><br />"But you said, the Govt rounding up citizens based on Religious or Ethnic Identity would not warrant armed resistance if courts bless the acts as constitutional?"<br /><br />{deer in headlight moment]<br /><br />We have to remember we do, after all, have Luther v Borden as precedent, holding that a 10 to one maladjusted representation in a state and an inability to amend the state constitution and a state government that shut out 9 of 10 residents from participation did not warrant armed revolt --although that is Taney of Dred Scott fame writing the decision, after all. Windy Wilsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01951254236693386401noreply@blogger.com