tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post6349451225318837538..comments2024-03-28T00:27:14.676-07:00Comments on Irons in the Fire: I'd wondered how the prosecutors would get around not prosecutingFirehandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04562365951182027709noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-84978669945487446392016-09-17T15:45:06.833-07:002016-09-17T15:45:06.833-07:00"Mr. Nixon, a Democrat, vetoed the measure in..."Mr. Nixon, a Democrat, vetoed the measure in June, saying it would allow individuals with a criminal record to legally carry a concealed firearm even though they had been, or would have been, denied a permit under the old law’s background check."<br /><br />No, nothing would change. Criminals already carry concealed illegally and they would still be carrying illegally, as criminals (felons)are forbidden to own guns.<br />Can't fix Stupid.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515829.post-52577781606187970162016-09-17T14:27:03.995-07:002016-09-17T14:27:03.995-07:00Does this mean I can open carry (OR CCW) in MA., C...Does this mean I can open carry (OR CCW) in MA., CA, NJ without being charged?<br />That's what I'm getting!!<br /><br />Roger V. TranfagliaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com