to make think."
Asserting that controversial speakers
“impose on the liberty of students, staff, and faculty at Wellesley,”
the committee members lament the fact that such speakers negatively
impact students by forcing them to “invest time and energy in rebutting
the speakers’ arguments.”
This is one of the most stupid things I've read in a while. Which is saying something. "This makes the students actually THINK and ARGUE about things! It's terrible! We can't have that!"
Yeah, actually having them listen to people they have to argue with takes away from indoctrination time.
I went into what once was our sleepy hometown the other day. An Aztec
totem devoted to Coatlicue, the earth-mother goddess, portrayed as a
paean to noble farm workers, sits in the old park. The huge monolith is
sculpted quite well and by a talented former colleague at CSU Fresno.
Its dedication was widely reported; no one was so rude as to mention
that Coatlicue was a fierce mother goddess to whom captives
were sacrificed each year. (She wore a necklace of human hearts and
hands and a cloak of skin.) But identity-politics art is never free from
overt propaganda: The modern epigraph atop our Coatlicue reads “Viva la Raza” (“Long live the Race”). I don’t recall anyone
in the city’s supposed illiberal past ever suggesting that “Long live
the race” would have been an acceptable epigraph on any city art.
But these are politically-correct racists, so it's good. Or something.