disbarred, where appropriate. Prosecuted, those who caused this crap in the first place and made false accusations. All benefits removed.
Hey, I'm not suggesting lampposts and ropes(yet), so I'm being generous here.
I wonder if these dirtbags have any idea what they've done to morale and the image of the agencies with this? Or care?
“A re-examination of the Commission’s approach to the Internet and other emerging technologies is long overdue,” she wrote, adding that
“the Commission has not adapted with” a changing world.
Warning against “turning a blind eye to the Internet’s growing force
in the political arena,” Ravel said that “this effort to protect
individual bloggers and online commentators” has been “stretched to
cover slickly-produced ads solely on the Internet.”
Hey, Ravel, I think control-freaks who dislike the Constitution- such as yourself- who make such suggestions should be given suitable acquaintance with a flagrum in the town square. Just to remind you and the others that YOU'RE NOT OUR GODS-DAMNED BOSSES.
More of that 'non-existent vote fraud' the Democrats keep insisting doesn't happen. Except when it does.
How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14
percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that
they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens
voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the
sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted
in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.
That's a bunch of people. And why are Democrats so against voter-ID laws?
Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80
percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find
that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for
Democratic victories in a few close elections.