and so forth, I'll believe they actually mean the crap they spout.
"We have told you what the truth is, stop following that 'air both sides' nonsense!" Wonderful words from a scientist, what?
The report re-affirms another published in 2012 in which genetics
professor Steve Jones criticized the organization’s “‘over-rigid’
application of the Editorial Guidelines on impartiality in relation to
Because Science! doesn't need both sides of the argument being aired; it might confuse the serfs.
The coverage “fails to take into account what [Jones] regards as the
‘non-contentious’ nature of some stories and the need to avoid giving
‘undue attention to marginal opinion,’” read the 2012 report, which
noted that Jones cited man-made climate change as an example.
They declare what they believe 'non-contentious' and therefore the other side shouldn't be heard. Friggin' wonderful.
Well, Officer Jacobs, if you and your uniformed friend acted properly, why don't you demand the video be released? Some reason you don't want it seen?